Sunday, February 19, 2012

Hunger Games

So many of my friends have read the Hunger Games and have pretty much raved about it to me. I knew a bit about the story line. Although the plot wasn't something that would have drawn me to the bookshelves, I decided to give it a try, based on the recommendation of said friends and family. If this is on your to read list, you many not want to read any further.

I was disappointed, and more than disappointed, disturbed that so many people (particularly our upper el/middle school children) loved this book. Not just because of the premise (children killing children), but because of the acceptance of society (wait, not just acceptance, but eagerness of society) to watch the broadcast with all the gory details. Don't bother to tell me it's just a book - a book (at least a good book) will take you outside yourself and make you a part of the story. The very best books make you forget the world you are currently living in and enter another.

The book starts well, with the heroine Katniss, giving up herself to the "games" to save her sister Prim. That is an admirable part of her personality--that and the responsibility she took for her family after her father's death. Once she is in the Capital, and then in the games themselves, she loses her luster for me.

First, she is the most confused heroine I ever met. The things she does that are good, are accidental events, not intentional events. The fact that she is later chosen to be the leader of an uprising, has nothing to do with doing what is right and good, but only to do with getting some selfish desires on her part. These desires are not necessarily bad desires, but, they are not for the greater good, they are for the good of her, her family and her friends. She doesn't really even understand what the uprising is about in any good way. Her friends, Gale and Peeta, have a better understanding of it than she does. I'm a little disgusted with her! I don't want my hero's to be confused - I want them to know the right path and to take it with purpose. I hope, if I ever am called upon to be a hero, that I will do it with rightness and purpose.

Second, you're not too far into the book and you realize it's a story that could have been crafted from a video game. The people that design the games are given the title of Gamemaker. The games are controlled by the gamemakers and might include catastrophes of nature, circumstances that force the children into combat with each other, and the gifts of sponsors that might heal wounds, provide food or water, or provide shelter to give their chosen candidate an advantage over another. Society (excluding the families of the children who participate) is eager to watch blood shed and cheer their chosen candidate on. The candidates may form an alliance with each other while it is convenient, only to kill in the end, as there can be only one survivor.

I know that kids are playing video games like this today. Many of them are ugly games, that in my view are not good past times for kids or really even adults. For a person who is competitive, and who likes challenges, a video game requires a person to use skillful thinking and planning to achieve victory. But why are so many of them killing games? I know my kids would not agree with me, but I do think we become desensitized to the violence, particularly as video games can be so realistic nowadays. They would also say they know the difference between what is real and what is not real (this is actually a line that is used in the last book for a character that can no longer make that distinction), but how long before some cross the line?

If you have read a book like Lord of the Rings, the Narnia series, or even something like Redwall, you are familiar with the good vs evil plot. With the aforementioned books, the bright thread of hope was woven through the story line. In "Hunger Games", I feel there was only despair. Even the "good guys" resorted to evil in the end. There wasn't a clear distinction between right and wrong, and ruined, forlorn lives were not resurrected. I myself, did not feel the ending was a hopeful one, I felt it was mostly sad.

Even more disturbing to me, I came away feeling like we are not too far off from being a Hunger Games society. We may not be participating in these actual games, but we are participating in games with people's lives, whether it's in our politics, our ignorance or willingness to overlook poverty and the havoc it can cause, or our monetary systems. . . are we (am I) participating in endeavors that will keep people everywhere from hope and despair, or am I just watching the news and saying, oh, that's too bad? Worse, are we just indifferent because it has become the norm.

So, "Hunger Games" lovers, I did not like this book, and would not recommend it. If your children want to read it, please do read it first.

10 comments:

Tonia said...

I think that's what Collins is trying to say, that we have been desensitized by fake violence and soon we will want real violence. We as a society are so close to this already and if we don't do something about it, this is where she sees us going. I don't think she wants to glorify violence at all. I think she wants you to be disgusted. I also think that she agrees with you that sacrificing children is wrong, but that we are doing that anyway.

I know you don't want to, but I think you should read the other two books.

Tonia said...

Ok, now that I know you've read all three, I won't worry about spoiling. If any other readers have plans to read the whole trilogy, you should reading this post now!

I think that Collins makes her main point in her choices at the end. I think that Collins is trying to say two things. One, is that there is no such thing as redemptive violence. Katniss wants nothing to do with fighting and struggles against it all the time. I think that's what makes her such a confused heroine. She is used throughout the whole series. Maybe as a side point to the violence issue Collins is also saying something about our heroes and what we do to them and what we expect from them. I would right this as a better essay with better examples, except I don't have a copy of the book and it's been two years since I read any of them.

The second point I think Collins is trying to make is shown in her choosing Peeta over Gale and in choosing for so long to not have children. She shows the damage done by violence to the soul and the heart. She also shows how it doesn't heal as fast as the body.

I think that overall Collins is anti-violence. She makes many of the same points in her series Gregor the Overlander.

Barb Terpstra said...

I'll have to google Suzanne Collins and see what I can find out about her. I appreciate what you're trying to say, and I think that's all great fodder for discussion, but I still just don't like these books--I know there is evil, but I do wish the bright thread of hope was stronger in the book. Do you think the bright thread of hope is missing in our world as a whole? I'm thinking the answer is yes, and that makes me sad.

Tonia said...

Well, I don't think it's coincidence that dystopian literature is pretty darn popular right now. If you really want to be sad, ask yourself who should be carrying the bright thread of hope and then ask how well are they doing the job?

Barb Terpstra said...

I know. It should be us! Every day I ask God to let my words and actions honor Him-that people will be drawn to His light in me. That I would so incandescent with His Joy that people would look at me and say - what's that she's got - I want that! Wouldn't that be something! One thing these books do make you think about is the "would I be any different" - same as I wonder with Holocaust stories and the like. Aren't books great - we may love them or hate them, but they can create good conversations! By the way, I am pondering your comment about hero's from yesterday. Also, did you really write that post at 3 am!!! Tonia :-)

Sarah Venlet said...

You probably think I forgot, but elephants never forget. So now that midterms are complete, my response to you is finally this: I am about to start re-reading the book in honor of the movie release, and I am still in shock that you disliked it so much.

you said you disliked it because of how the society in the book eagerly awaited the broadcast of the gory details, to not tell you its 'just a book', and that a good story takes you to another world. i agree with all of those things. While you may be appalled at the society in the book, remember that we are being brought there by the author, a society incredibly more messed up and different than our own. Maybe i speak for myself, but when I read it, I seemed to have forgotten I was merely reading about it..I was joining Katniss on the crazy adventure that is the Hunger Games.

Which brings me to address your thoughts on Katniss as the heroine. What I really liked about here was that she wasn't the hero who had everything figured out. A lot of heros are that way; look at Frodo- half the time he wasn't even sure he wanted to go to Mordor at all (talk about confused), a lot of the things he did also were by accident (ie-finding Smeagol, destroying the ring...). I would argue that in both these scenarios, and in most, the hero or heroine recieves a lot of outside help and gets the credit. What makes them a hero is rising to the occasion with courage.

You are the first one to tell me you disliked the book, Auntie Barb, so I was very surprised and a little saddened. Also, I liked what Tonia said about the hero too.

What is so unique about this book is that there is none like it. It's a new world waiting to be discovered. It may not be a pretty one, but it is intriguing and exciting and happening; adventurous. In my opinion, a great read.

Barb Terpstra said...

Sarah, one thing I've come to appreciate about this series is the conversations its created. Books, politics, art, God, and who knows what else are all so personal aren't they? It is sometimes a shock when others don't have our view. I'm surprised I'm the first to tell you I didn't like the book - I know more than a few people who do not.
I stick to my view on Katniss. . . although I agree Frodo was confused at time, in my view he still always knew what the right thing was, He was just overcome by the burden of how heavy that right thing was sometimes. We will have to have more book discussions :-)

lara parent said...

Great discussion, everyone. "Bright thread of hope....." (insert me exhaling here....) It took me a long time to read the first book due to the level of violence and how disturbing it is. But, I did really like the way that Collins shapes her characters and the storyline was so vividly striking--the landscapes, the woods, the villages, Peeta burning the bread, the hovels, the capitol... I fell in love with many of them. I think we are, our kids are, I am desensitized with the violence and quite frankly a lot of things that I should be more passionate about. Every time I eat meat, I fight that internal battle and block out the conflicts in my mind. And that's just one example of the contradictions that are me. I didn't think of the video game connection too much, but I did think of my childhood and all of the Greek Myths my dad used to read to us. Theseus and the Minotaur had young adult or maiden sacrifice in it. (?) I can remember being super disturbed by this (and other Greek tales), but at the same time fascinated by the storyline, the heroics, and the creativity that Theseus used to stop the madness of these sacrifices. This stuff has been around forever in children's literature. At least in my household :). I wonder if the Greeks or Romans were having the same discussions about the darkness of these myths?

I am really too brain-dead to contribute any more that is worthy of the above discussion, but I'd love to hear your thoughts on the Gregor series.

lara parent said...

Wow! In your world it's only 7:59 PM! Can I go there nowplease!

lara parent said...

Here is an interesting link from a great review site (Christian-based):

http://www.pluggedin.com/movies/intheaters/hunger-games.aspx

See what you think:)L